Date: 
      Tue, 07 May 2002 13:12:59 +0200  
      To: Nettime <nettime-l@bbs.thing.net>  
      From: "knowbotic.research" <krcf@khm.de>  
      Subject: <nettime> PUBLIC DOMAIN SCANNER  
      Sender: nettime-l-request@bbs.thing.net  
      Reply-To: "knowbotic.research" <krcf@khm.de> 
      
      Why do we 
        show the vulnerability of NGOs and media artists? 
         
        NGOs 
        and media artists are an important part of the contemporary  
        enlargement and diversification of the political and cultural landscape. 
         
        They enact a reconstruction of the public domain in a globalised world. 
        The 
        Internet is a crucial tool of these social and political agencies. It 
         
        facilitates a broad and potentially open system of communication and  
        information. 
        At 
        the same time, there is an increasing awareness that the Internet is  
        encroached by concerns about security: data security, privacy, military 
         
        security, etc. 
        The 
        dilemma of these security concerns is that they seek to protect a  
        public domain which is corrupted by the very attempts to secure their 
         
        functionality. 
        This 
        dilemma is the central theme of this project. By scanning the ports of 
         
        the NGO's and media artists servers we are trying to pinpoint the dilemma 
         
        of NGOs and media artists having to protect an independent and progressive 
         
        political and social practice through security measures which are  
        constantly being tried, tested and attacked with ever new invasive tools. 
         
        In the project, we are using non-invasive SECURITY scanning tools, which 
         
        systems administrators alike use in order to detect security holes on 
        the  
        Internet servers. 
       
        In this project, we determine the borders of what is and what is not legal 
         
        in the (US) public domain after patriot act  
        (http://unitedwehack.ath.cx/infoPatriotAct.htm), and we are trying to 
        seek  
        out the areas of friction between an active construction of the public 
         
        domain, the expansive US legal system, and the debilitating dimensions 
        of  
        an intensively patrolled, supposedly open communication and information 
         
        infrastructure like the Internet. 
        | 
     
         Location 
          
        On 
        the US legal bug 
         
         7.5.: 
        <nettime> 
        PDS 
         7.5.: 
        Re: <nettime> [L. Brown] 
         7.5.: 
        Re: 
        <nettime> 
        [F. Cramer]  
         8.5.:Re: 
        <nettime> KR 
         8.5.: 
        scan 
        reports  
         9.5.: 
        Server 
        Migration US  
         Port 
        scanning is legal in the US 
         
         10.5.: 
        provider vs kr 
        CRACKED 
        ..Minds of concern::breakingnews...!! 
        May 12,2002 
         
         13.5.:New 
        York Times Article  
         RE2: 
        NYTIMES article 
         
          
        RE2: 
        NYTIMES article 
          
          
        RE:3 
        NYTIMES article: KR 
         15.5.: 
        wired article 
         [ 
        thing] review 
         19.5.: 
        Sonntagszeitung 
          
        13.6.: neural.it 
          
        14.6.:NZZ 
         
         
           
          
        Invitation to the open source exhibition   
        curated by Steve Dietz and Jenny Markatou (?) 
          
          
       
       |